🔗 Share this article

Itranspired he was able to withstand a loss to Grimsby. He weathered an important European final against one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood losing at home to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, laying waste to some of the club’s best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, calling his team the worst the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to tango. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, like many a top-flight defender in Blackburn’s championship campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. Even the most casual observer will notice the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated at his players for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing in the face of the intense pressure and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most feared football executives.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, given his nine months in a similar role with the Saints, to view him as little more than a drudge in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position largely to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive before him, he has proved himself to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which United’s mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Conflict Regarding System & Philosophy

To illustrate, it was the director who having been part of the leadership that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas met a certain resistance. However, these judgements hold greater authority when delivered by a man of a man the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a championship team decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is walking away with a full payout, without any penalty clause in place. The director speaks rarely publicly, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – function on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not the same as being ready to comprehend it.

An Supreme Authority Behind the Throne

But of course, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the directives of his superior the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to embrace analytics and analytics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he announced that United’s style of play “shall be determined in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he is incredibly rich, and as we all know, the wealthy are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, strategically brilliant, fundamentally superior. Whom else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

The New Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Above Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to join a club and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many companies have these guys established? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive professional resumes. Better by far to determine the tactics by the directors and appoint a coach who can tailor their methods accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to delivery personnel: not responsible for the product, but still finally accountable if it arrives cold or leaks out of the box.

Nowadays, their job has become less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they can do little to influence. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of literal children into Europe and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy finds his reputation ruined while those individuals who hired him continue to make errors another day.

A Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this is simply corporate governance at work: the elevation of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose choices remain untouchable, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss him for playing too much that system. Hire the project manager and later discard him for requiring excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.